00
Correct
00
Incorrect
00 : 00 : 00
Session Time
00 : 00
Average Question Time ( Mins)
  • Question 1 - A 30-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial...

    Correct

    • A 30-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial injuries. X-rays and CT scans of her face show that she has a Le Fort II fracture.
      What is the most accurate description of a Le Fort II fracture?

      Your Answer: ‘Floating maxilla’

      Explanation:

      Le Fort fractures are complex fractures of the midface that involve the maxillary bone and surrounding structures. These fractures can occur in a horizontal, pyramidal, or transverse direction. The distinguishing feature of Le Fort fractures is the traumatic separation of the pterygomaxillary region. They make up approximately 10% to 20% of all facial fractures and can have severe consequences, both in terms of potential life-threatening injuries and disfigurement.

      The Le Fort classification system categorizes midface fractures into three groups based on the plane of injury. As the classification level increases, the location of the maxillary fracture moves from inferior to superior within the maxilla.

      Le Fort I fractures are horizontal fractures that occur across the lower aspect of the maxilla. These fractures cause the teeth to separate from the upper face and extend through the lower nasal septum, the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, and into the palatine bones and pterygoid plates. They are sometimes referred to as a floating palate because they often result in the mobility of the hard palate from the midface. Common accompanying symptoms include facial swelling, loose teeth, dental fractures, and misalignment of the teeth.

      Le Fort II fractures are pyramidal-shaped fractures, with the base of the pyramid located at the level of the teeth and the apex at the nasofrontal suture. The fracture line extends from the nasal bridge and passes through the superior wall of the maxilla, the lacrimal bones, the inferior orbital floor and rim, and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. These fractures are sometimes called a floating maxilla because they typically result in the mobility of the maxilla from the midface. Common symptoms include facial swelling, nosebleeds, subconjunctival hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid leakage from the nose, and widening and flattening of the nasal bridge.

      Le Fort III fractures are transverse fractures of the midface. The fracture line passes through the nasofrontal suture, the maxillo frontal suture, the orbital wall, and the zygomatic arch and zygomaticofrontal suture. These fractures cause separation of all facial bones from the cranial base, earning them the nickname craniofacial disjunction or floating face fractures. They are the rarest and most severe type of Le Fort fracture. Common symptoms include significant facial swelling, bruising around the eyes, facial flattening, and the entire face can be shifted.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      61.4
      Seconds
  • Question 2 - A 42-year-old man comes in with bleeding from a tooth socket that began...

    Incorrect

    • A 42-year-old man comes in with bleeding from a tooth socket that began slightly over 48 hours after a dental extraction. The bleeding is excessive, but his vital signs are currently within normal range.
      What is the most probable underlying cause of his dental hemorrhage?

      Your Answer: Platelet dysfunction

      Correct Answer: Clot infection

      Explanation:

      This patient is currently experiencing a secondary haemorrhage after undergoing a dental extraction. There are three different types of haemorrhage that can occur following a dental extraction. The first type is immediate haemorrhage, which happens during the extraction itself. The second type is reactionary haemorrhage, which typically occurs 2-3 hours after the extraction when the vasoconstrictor effects of the local anaesthetic wear off. Lastly, there is secondary haemorrhage, which usually happens at around 48-72 hours after the extraction and is a result of the clot becoming infected.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      74.7
      Seconds
  • Question 3 - A 35-year-old woman comes in with intense pain five days after a recent...

    Correct

    • A 35-year-old woman comes in with intense pain five days after a recent tooth extraction. The pain is primarily concentrated in the socket where the tooth was removed. Upon examination, she has no fever and there are no signs of facial or gum swelling.

      What is the SINGLE most probable diagnosis?

      Your Answer: Dry socket

      Explanation:

      This patient is experiencing a condition called acute alveolar osteitis, commonly known as ‘dry socket’. It occurs when the blood clot covering the socket gets dislodged, leaving the bone and nerve exposed. This can result in infection and intense pain.

      There are several risk factors associated with the development of a dry socket. These include smoking, inadequate dental hygiene, extraction of wisdom teeth, use of oral contraceptive pills, and a previous history of dry socket.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      63.2
      Seconds
  • Question 4 - A 35-year-old woman is involved in a car crash and sustains severe facial...

    Incorrect

    • A 35-year-old woman is involved in a car crash and sustains severe facial injuries. Facial X-rays and CT scans show the presence of a Le Fort III fracture.
      What is the most probable cause of this injury?

      Your Answer: A force through the mid maxilla

      Correct Answer: A force through the nasal bridge and upper part of the maxilla

      Explanation:

      Le Fort fractures are intricate fractures of the midface, which involve the maxillary bone and the surrounding structures. These fractures can occur in a horizontal, pyramidal, or transverse direction. The distinguishing feature of Le Fort fractures is the separation of the pterygomaxillary due to trauma. They make up approximately 10% to 20% of all facial fractures and can have severe consequences, both in terms of potential life-threatening situations and disfigurement.

      The causes of Le Fort fractures vary depending on the type of fracture. Common mechanisms include motor vehicle accidents, sports injuries, assaults, and falls from significant heights. Patients with Le Fort fractures often have concurrent head and cervical spine injuries. Additionally, they frequently experience other facial fractures, as well as neuromuscular injuries and dental avulsions.

      The specific type of fracture sustained is determined by the direction of the force applied to the face. Le Fort type I fractures typically occur when a force is directed downward against the upper teeth. Le Fort type II fractures are usually the result of a force applied to the lower or mid maxilla. Lastly, Le Fort type III fractures are typically caused by a force applied to the nasal bridge and upper part of the maxilla.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      46.1
      Seconds
  • Question 5 - A 25-year-old male arrives at the emergency department following a fall from a...

    Correct

    • A 25-year-old male arrives at the emergency department following a fall from a wall and hitting his face on a concrete bollard. There is a suspicion of a Le Fort fracture. What clinical tests would you perform to confirm this?

      Your Answer: Place one hand on the forehead to stabilise it. With the other hand gently grip the upper teeth and anterior maxilla and gently rock the hard palate back and forth

      Explanation:

      To clinically test for Le Fort fractures, one can perform the following procedure: Place one hand on the forehead to stabilize it, and with the other hand, gently grip the upper teeth and anterior maxilla. Then, gently rock the hard palate back and forth.

      This test is useful in suspected cases of Le Fort fractures. In a Le Fort I fracture, only the teeth and hard palate will move, while the rest of the mid face and skull remain still. In Le Fort II fractures, the teeth, hard palate, and nose will move, but the eyes and zygomatic arches will remain still. In Le Fort III fractures, the entire face will move in relation to the forehead.

      Further Reading:

      The Le Fort fracture classification describes three fracture patterns seen in midface fractures, all involving the maxilla and pterygoid plate disruption. As the classification grading increases, the anatomic level of the maxillary fracture ascends from inferior to superior.

      Le Fort I fractures, also known as floating palate fractures, typically result from a downward blow struck above the upper dental row. Signs include swelling of the upper lip, bruising to the upper buccal sulcus, malocclusion, and mobile upper teeth.

      Le Fort II fractures, also known as floating maxilla fractures, are typically the result of a forceful blow to the midaxillary area. Signs include a step deformity at the infraorbital margin, oedema over the middle third of the face, sensory disturbance of the cheek, and bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis.

      Le Fort III fractures, also known as craniofacial dislocation or floating face fractures, are typically the result of high force blows to the nasal bridge or upper maxilla. These fractures involve the zygomatic arch and extend through various structures in the face. Signs include tenderness at the frontozygomatic suture, lengthening of the face, enophthalmos, and bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis.

      Management of Le Fort fractures involves securing the airway as a priority, following the ABCDE approach, and identifying and managing other injuries, especially cervical spine injuries. Severe bleeding may occur and should be addressed appropriately. Surgery is almost always required, and patients should be referred to maxillofacial surgeons. Other specialties, such as neurosurgery and ophthalmology, may need to be involved depending on the specific case.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      101.6
      Seconds
  • Question 6 - A 35 year old epileptic is brought into the emergency department after experiencing...

    Correct

    • A 35 year old epileptic is brought into the emergency department after experiencing a grand mal seizure. The patient is unable to close their mouth. You suspect temporomandibular joint dislocation. What is the initial imaging test recommended for diagnosing this condition?

      Your Answer: Orthopantomogram

      Explanation:

      The recommended first-line diagnostic test for TMJ dislocation is an OPG. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine suggests that an OPG is the most effective initial imaging technique for diagnosing TMJ dislocation. However, mandibular series X-ray views and CT scans can also be used as alternative imaging methods.

      Further Reading:

      TMJ dislocation occurs when the mandibular condyle is displaced from its normal position in the mandibular fossa of the temporal bone. The most common type of dislocation is bilateral anterior dislocation. This occurs when the mandible is dislocated forward and the masseter and pterygoid muscles spasm, locking the condyle in place.

      The temporomandibular joint is unique because it has an articular disc that separates the joint into upper and lower compartments. Dislocation can be caused by trauma, such as a direct blow to the open mouth, or by traumatic events like excessive mouth opening during yawning, laughing, shouting, or eating. It can also occur during dental work.

      Signs and symptoms of TMJ dislocation include difficulty fully opening or closing the mouth, pain or tenderness in the TMJ region, jaw pain, ear pain, difficulty chewing, and facial pain. Connective tissue disorders like Marfan’s and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome can increase the likelihood of dislocation.

      If TMJ dislocation is suspected, X-rays may be done to confirm the diagnosis. The best initial imaging technique is an orthopantomogram (OPG) or a standard mandibular series.

      Management of anterior dislocations involves reducing the dislocated mandible, which is usually done in the emergency department. Dislocations to the posterior, medial, or lateral side are usually associated with a mandibular fracture and should be referred to a maxillofacial surgeon.

      Reduction of an anterior dislocation involves applying distraction forces to the mandible. This can be done by gripping the mandible externally or intra-orally. In some cases, procedural sedation or local anesthesia may be used, and in rare cases, reduction may be done under general anesthesia.

      After reduction, a post-reduction X-ray is done to confirm adequate reduction and rule out any fractures caused by the procedure. Discharge advice includes following a soft diet for at least 48 hours, avoiding wide mouth opening for at least 2 weeks, and supporting the mouth with the hand during yawning or laughing. A Barton bandage may be used to support the mandible if the patient is unable to comply with the discharge advice. Referral to a maxillofacial surgeon as an outpatient is also recommended.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      81.4
      Seconds
  • Question 7 - A 28-year-old woman has been involved in a physical altercation outside a bar....

    Incorrect

    • A 28-year-old woman has been involved in a physical altercation outside a bar. She has been hit multiple times in the face and has a noticeable swelling on her right cheek. Her facial X-ray shows a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture but no other injuries.
      Which of the following will NOT be visible on her X-ray?

      Your Answer: Fracture of the anterior maxillary sinus

      Correct Answer: Fracture of the superior orbital rim

      Explanation:

      Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures, also known as quadramalar or tripod fractures, make up around 40% of all midface fractures and are the second most common facial bone fractures after nasal bone fractures.

      These injuries typically occur when a direct blow is delivered to the malar eminence of the cheek. They consist of four components:

      1. Widening of the zygomaticofrontal suture
      2. Fracture of the zygomatic arch
      3. Fracture of the inferior orbital rim and the walls of the anterior and posterior maxillary sinuses
      4. Fracture of the lateral orbital rim.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      95.8
      Seconds
  • Question 8 - The Emergency Medicine consultant in charge of the department today asks for your...

    Correct

    • The Emergency Medicine consultant in charge of the department today asks for your attention to present a case of superior orbital fissure syndrome (SOFS) in a 30-year-old woman with a Le Fort II fracture of the midface after a car accident.

      Which of the following anatomical structures does NOT traverse through the superior orbital fissure?

      Your Answer: Facial vein

      Explanation:

      The superior orbital fissure is a gap in the back wall of the orbit, created by the space between the greater and lesser wings of the sphenoid bone. Several structures pass through it to enter the orbit, starting from the top and going downwards. These include the lacrimal nerve (a branch of CN V1), the frontal nerve (another branch of CN V1), the superior ophthalmic vein, the trochlear nerve (CN IV), the superior division of the oculomotor nerve (CN III), the nasociliary nerve (a branch of CN V1), the inferior division of the oculomotor nerve (CN III), the abducens nerve (CN VI), and the inferior ophthalmic vein.

      Adjacent to the superior orbital fissure, on the back wall of the orbit and towards the middle, is the optic canal. The optic nerve (CN II) exits the orbit through this canal, along with the ophthalmic artery.

      Superior orbital fissure syndrome (SOFS) is a condition characterized by a combination of symptoms and signs that occur when cranial nerves III, IV, V1, and VI are compressed or injured as they pass through the superior orbital fissure. This condition also leads to swelling and protrusion of the eye due to impaired drainage and congestion. The main causes of SOFS are trauma, tumors, and inflammation. It is important to note that CN II is not affected by this syndrome, as it follows a separate path through the optic canal.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      49.4
      Seconds
  • Question 9 - A 28-year-old woman has been involved in a physical altercation outside a bar....

    Correct

    • A 28-year-old woman has been involved in a physical altercation outside a bar. She has been hit multiple times in the face and has a noticeable swelling on her right cheek. Her facial X-ray shows a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture but no other injuries.

      Which of the following will be visible on her X-ray?

      Your Answer: Fracture of the zygomatic arch

      Explanation:

      Zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures, also known as quadramalar or tripod fractures, make up around 40% of all midface fractures and are the second most common facial bone fractures after nasal bone fractures.

      These injuries typically occur when a direct blow is delivered to the malar eminence of the cheek. They consist of four components:

      1. Widening of the zygomaticofrontal suture
      2. Fracture of the zygomatic arch
      3. Fracture of the inferior orbital rim and the walls of the anterior and posterior maxillary sinuses
      4. Fracture of the lateral orbital rim.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      44.4
      Seconds
  • Question 10 - You review the X-ray's of a young patient and they confirm a zygomatic...

    Correct

    • You review the X-ray's of a young patient and they confirm a zygomatic fracture.

      All of the following are reasons for immediate referral to the ophthalmologist or maxillofacial surgeons EXCEPT for which one?

      Your Answer: Otalgia

      Explanation:

      If a patient with a zygoma fracture experiences visual disturbance, limited eye movements (especially upward gaze), or shows a teardrop sign on a facial X-ray, it is important to refer them urgently to ophthalmology or maxillofacial surgeons.

      Further Reading:

      Zygomatic injuries, also known as zygomatic complex fractures, involve fractures of the zygoma bone and often affect surrounding bones such as the maxilla and temporal bones. These fractures can be classified into four positions: the lateral and inferior orbital rim, the zygomaticomaxillary buttress, and the zygomatic arch. The full extent of these injuries may not be visible on plain X-rays and may require a CT scan for accurate diagnosis.

      Zygomatic fractures can pose risks to various structures in the face. The temporalis muscle and coronoid process of the mandible may become trapped in depressed fractures of the zygomatic arch. The infraorbital nerve, which passes through the infraorbital foramen, can be injured in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. In orbital floor fractures, the inferior rectus muscle may herniate into the maxillary sinus.

      Clinical assessment of zygomatic injuries involves observing facial asymmetry, depressed facial bones, contusion, and signs of eye injury. Visual acuity must be assessed, and any persistent bleeding from the nose or mouth should be noted. Nasal injuries, including septal hematoma, and intra-oral abnormalities should also be evaluated. Tenderness of facial bones and the temporomandibular joint should be assessed, along with any step deformities or crepitus. Eye and jaw movements must also be evaluated.

      Imaging for zygomatic injuries typically includes facial X-rays, such as occipitomental views, and CT scans for a more detailed assessment. It is important to consider the possibility of intracranial hemorrhage and cervical spine injury in patients with facial fractures.

      Management of most zygomatic fractures can be done on an outpatient basis with maxillofacial follow-up, assuming the patient is stable and there is no evidence of eye injury. However, orbital floor fractures should be referred immediately to ophthalmologists or maxillofacial surgeons. Zygomatic arch injuries that restrict mouth opening or closing due to entrapment of the temporalis muscle or mandibular condyle also require urgent referral. Nasal fractures, often seen in conjunction with other facial fractures, can be managed by outpatient ENT follow-up but should be referred urgently if there is uncontrolled epistaxis, CSF rhinorrhea, or septal hematoma.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      34.2
      Seconds
  • Question 11 - A 22-year-old individual arrives at the emergency department complaining of jaw pain and...

    Correct

    • A 22-year-old individual arrives at the emergency department complaining of jaw pain and difficulty in fully closing their mouth. They explain that this issue arose while yawning. The patient has a medical history of Ehlers Danlos syndrome. What is the probable diagnosis?

      Your Answer: Dislocated temporomandibular joint

      Explanation:

      The most frequent cause of atraumatic TMJ dislocation is yawning. Individuals with connective tissue disorders like Marfan’s and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes have a higher susceptibility to atraumatic dislocation.

      Further Reading:

      TMJ dislocation occurs when the mandibular condyle is displaced from its normal position in the mandibular fossa of the temporal bone. The most common type of dislocation is bilateral anterior dislocation. This occurs when the mandible is dislocated forward and the masseter and pterygoid muscles spasm, locking the condyle in place.

      The temporomandibular joint is unique because it has an articular disc that separates the joint into upper and lower compartments. Dislocation can be caused by trauma, such as a direct blow to the open mouth, or by traumatic events like excessive mouth opening during yawning, laughing, shouting, or eating. It can also occur during dental work.

      Signs and symptoms of TMJ dislocation include difficulty fully opening or closing the mouth, pain or tenderness in the TMJ region, jaw pain, ear pain, difficulty chewing, and facial pain. Connective tissue disorders like Marfan’s and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome can increase the likelihood of dislocation.

      If TMJ dislocation is suspected, X-rays may be done to confirm the diagnosis. The best initial imaging technique is an orthopantomogram (OPG) or a standard mandibular series.

      Management of anterior dislocations involves reducing the dislocated mandible, which is usually done in the emergency department. Dislocations to the posterior, medial, or lateral side are usually associated with a mandibular fracture and should be referred to a maxillofacial surgeon.

      Reduction of an anterior dislocation involves applying distraction forces to the mandible. This can be done by gripping the mandible externally or intra-orally. In some cases, procedural sedation or local anesthesia may be used, and in rare cases, reduction may be done under general anesthesia.

      After reduction, a post-reduction X-ray is done to confirm adequate reduction and rule out any fractures caused by the procedure. Discharge advice includes following a soft diet for at least 48 hours, avoiding wide mouth opening for at least 2 weeks, and supporting the mouth with the hand during yawning or laughing. A Barton bandage may be used to support the mandible if the patient is unable to comply with the discharge advice. Referral to a maxillofacial surgeon as an outpatient is also recommended.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      40.9
      Seconds
  • Question 12 - You finish evaluating a 32-year-old individual who has been brought to the emergency...

    Correct

    • You finish evaluating a 32-year-old individual who has been brought to the emergency department after being involved in a physical altercation. You suspect that the patient may have a fractured mandible. What would be the most suitable examination to confirm the suspected diagnosis?

      Your Answer: Orthopantomogram

      Explanation:

      The OPG is the recommended first-line imaging test for diagnosing TMJ dislocation and mandibular fractures.

      Further Reading:

      Mandibular fractures are a common type of facial fracture that often present to the emergency department. The mandible, or lower jaw, is formed by the fusion of two hemimandibles and articulates with the temporomandibular joints. Fractures of the mandible are typically caused by direct lateral force and often involve multiple fracture sites, including the body, condylar head and neck, and ramus.

      When assessing for mandibular fractures, clinicians should use a look, feel, move method similar to musculoskeletal examination. However, it is important to note that TMJ effusion, muscle spasm, and pain can make moving the mandible difficult. Key signs of mandibular fracture include malocclusion, trismus (limited mouth opening), pain with the mouth closed, broken teeth, step deformity, hematoma in the sublingual space, lacerations to the gum mucosa, and bleeding from the ear.

      The Manchester Mandibular Fracture Decision Rule uses the absence of five exam findings (malocclusion, trismus, broken teeth, pain with closed mouth, and step deformity) to exclude mandibular fracture. This rule has been found to be 100% sensitive and 39% specific in detecting mandibular fractures. Imaging is an important tool in diagnosing mandibular fractures, with an OPG X-ray considered the best initial imaging for TMJ dislocation and mandibular fracture. CT may be used if the OPG is technically difficult or if a CT is being performed for other reasons, such as a head injury.

      It is important to note that head injury often accompanies mandibular fractures, so a thorough head injury assessment should be performed. Additionally, about a quarter of patients with mandibular fractures will also have a fracture of at least one other facial bone.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      33.6
      Seconds
  • Question 13 - A 35-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial...

    Correct

    • A 35-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial trauma. Imaging studies show that she has a Le Fort I fracture.
      What is the characteristic injury pattern of a Le Fort I fracture?

      Your Answer: Horizontal fracture across the inferior aspect of the maxilla

      Explanation:

      Le Fort fractures are complex fractures of the midface that involve the maxillary bone and surrounding structures. These fractures can occur in a horizontal, pyramidal, or transverse direction. The distinguishing feature of Le Fort fractures is the traumatic separation of the pterygomaxillary region. They make up approximately 10% to 20% of all facial fractures and can have severe consequences, both in terms of potential life-threatening injuries and disfigurement.

      The Le Fort classification system categorizes midface fractures into three groups based on the plane of injury. As the classification level increases, the location of the maxillary fracture moves from inferior to superior within the maxilla.

      Le Fort I fractures are horizontal fractures that occur across the lower aspect of the maxilla. These fractures cause the teeth to separate from the upper face and extend through the lower nasal septum, the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, and into the palatine bones and pterygoid plates. They are sometimes referred to as a floating palate because they often result in the mobility of the hard palate from the midface. Common accompanying symptoms include facial swelling, loose teeth, dental fractures, and misalignment of the teeth.

      Le Fort II fractures are pyramidal-shaped fractures, with the base of the pyramid located at the level of the teeth and the apex at the nasofrontal suture. The fracture line extends from the nasal bridge and passes through the superior wall of the maxilla, the lacrimal bones, the inferior orbital floor and rim, and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. These fractures are sometimes called a floating maxilla because they typically result in the mobility of the maxilla from the midface. Common symptoms include facial swelling, nosebleeds, subconjunctival hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid leakage from the nose, and widening and flattening of the nasal bridge.

      Le Fort III fractures are transverse fractures of the midface. The fracture line passes through the nasofrontal suture, the maxillo frontal suture, the orbital wall, and the zygomatic arch and zygomaticofrontal suture. These fractures cause separation of all facial bones from the cranial base, earning them the nickname craniofacial disjunction or floating face fractures. They are the rarest and most severe type of Le Fort fracture. Common symptoms include significant facial swelling, bruising around the eyes, facial flattening, and the entire face can be shifted.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      41.7
      Seconds
  • Question 14 - You are examining the facial X-rays of a young patient who was involved...

    Incorrect

    • You are examining the facial X-rays of a young patient who was involved in a physical altercation and sustained multiple facial injuries. What tools or techniques are utilized to aid in the interpretation of facial radiographs and facilitate the identification of facial fractures?

      Your Answer: Le Fort lines

      Correct Answer: Dolan lines

      Explanation:

      The interpretation of facial X-rays is often assisted by the use of McGrigor-Campbell lines and Dolan lines. These lines, along with accompanying notes and images, provide additional information for a more accurate analysis.

      Further Reading:

      Facial X-rays are commonly used to assess and diagnose facial fractures. Two standard views are typically performed: the Occipitomental view and the Occipitomental 30º view. The Occipitomental view provides a comprehensive look at the upper and middle thirds of the face, including the orbital margins, frontal sinuses, zygomatic arches, and maxillary antra. On the other hand, the Occipitomental 30º view uses a 30-degree caudal angulation to better visualize the zygomatic arches and walls of the maxillary antra, although it may compromise the clear view of the orbital margins.

      To assist in the interpretation of facial X-rays, imaginary lines are often drawn across the images to highlight any asymmetry or disruption. Two commonly used sets of lines are the McGrigor-Campbell lines and Dolan’s lines. McGrigor-Campbell lines are used to aid in the interpretation of both the Occipitomental and Occipitomental 30º views. These lines include an upper line that passes through the zygomatico-frontal sutures and the upper edge of the orbits, a middle line that follows the zygomatic arch and crosses the zygomatic bone, and a lower line that passes through the condyle and coronoid process of the mandible and the walls of the maxillary antra.

      Dolan’s lines, described by Dolan and Jacoby, are often used in conjunction with McGrigor-Campbell lines. These lines include the orbital line, which traces the inner margins of the orbital walls and the nasal arch, the zygomatic line, which traces the superior margin of the zygomatic arch and body, and the maxillary line, which traces the inferior margin of the zygomatic arch, body, and buttress, as well as the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus. Together, the zygomatic and maxillary lines resemble the profile of an elephant’s head and are referred to as Dolan’s elephant. These lines help provide additional information and aid in the interpretation of facial X-rays.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      64.9
      Seconds
  • Question 15 - The Emergency Medicine consultant in charge of the department today calls you over...

    Correct

    • The Emergency Medicine consultant in charge of the department today calls you over to show you a case of superior orbital fissure syndrome (SOFS) in a 32-year-old woman with a Le Fort II fracture of the midface following a car accident.

      Which of the cranial nerves is MOST likely to be unaffected?

      Your Answer: Cranial nerve II

      Explanation:

      The superior orbital fissure is a gap in the back wall of the orbit, created by the space between the greater and lesser wings of the sphenoid bone. Several structures pass through it to enter the orbit, starting from the top and going downwards. These include the lacrimal nerve (a branch of CN V1), the frontal nerve (another branch of CN V1), the superior ophthalmic vein, the trochlear nerve (CN IV), the superior division of the oculomotor nerve (CN III), the nasociliary nerve (a branch of CN V1), the inferior division of the oculomotor nerve (CN III), the abducens nerve (CN VI), and the inferior ophthalmic vein.

      Adjacent to the superior orbital fissure, on the back wall of the orbit and towards the middle, is the optic canal. The optic nerve (CN II) exits the orbit through this canal, along with the ophthalmic artery.

      Superior orbital fissure syndrome (SOFS) is a condition characterized by a combination of symptoms and signs that occur when cranial nerves III, IV, V1, and VI are compressed or injured as they pass through the superior orbital fissure. This condition also leads to swelling and protrusion of the eye due to impaired drainage and congestion. The main causes of SOFS are trauma, tumors, and inflammation. It is important to note that CN II is not affected by this syndrome, as it follows a separate path through the optic canal.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      43.7
      Seconds
  • Question 16 - A 42-year-old woman comes in with bleeding from a tooth socket that began...

    Correct

    • A 42-year-old woman comes in with bleeding from a tooth socket that began slightly over 48 hours after a dental extraction. The bleeding is excessive, but her vital signs are currently stable.
      What type of dental hemorrhage is present in this case?

      Your Answer: Secondary haemorrhage

      Explanation:

      This patient is currently experiencing a secondary haemorrhage after undergoing a dental extraction. There are three different types of haemorrhage that can occur following a dental extraction. The first type is immediate haemorrhage, which happens during the extraction itself. The second type is reactionary haemorrhage, which typically occurs 2-3 hours after the extraction when the vasoconstrictor effects of the local anaesthetic wear off. Lastly, there is secondary haemorrhage, which usually happens at around 48-72 hours after the extraction and is a result of the clot becoming infected.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      34.4
      Seconds
  • Question 17 - A 30-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial...

    Correct

    • A 30-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial injuries. X-rays and CT scans of her face show that she has a Le Fort I fracture.
      What is the most accurate description of a Le Fort I fracture?

      Your Answer: ‘Floating palate’

      Explanation:

      Le Fort fractures are complex fractures of the midface that involve the maxillary bone and surrounding structures. These fractures can occur in a horizontal, pyramidal, or transverse direction. The distinguishing feature of Le Fort fractures is the traumatic separation of the pterygomaxillary region. They make up approximately 10% to 20% of all facial fractures and can have severe consequences, both in terms of potential life-threatening injuries and disfigurement.

      The Le Fort classification system categorizes midface fractures into three groups based on the plane of injury. As the classification level increases, the location of the maxillary fracture moves from inferior to superior within the maxilla.

      Le Fort I fractures are horizontal fractures that occur across the lower aspect of the maxilla. These fractures cause the teeth to separate from the upper face and extend through the lower nasal septum, the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, and into the palatine bones and pterygoid plates. They are sometimes referred to as a floating palate because they often result in the mobility of the hard palate from the midface. Common accompanying symptoms include facial swelling, loose teeth, dental fractures, and misalignment of the teeth.

      Le Fort II fractures are pyramidal-shaped fractures, with the base of the pyramid located at the level of the teeth and the apex at the nasofrontal suture. The fracture line extends from the nasal bridge and passes through the superior wall of the maxilla, the lacrimal bones, the inferior orbital floor and rim, and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. These fractures are sometimes called a floating maxilla because they typically result in the mobility of the maxilla from the midface. Common symptoms include facial swelling, nosebleeds, subconjunctival hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid leakage from the nose, and widening and flattening of the nasal bridge.

      Le Fort III fractures are transverse fractures of the midface. The fracture line passes through the nasofrontal suture, the maxillo frontal suture, the orbital wall, and the zygomatic arch and zygomaticofrontal suture. These fractures cause separation of all facial bones from the cranial base, earning them the nickname craniofacial disjunction or floating face fractures. They are the rarest and most severe type of Le Fort fracture. Common symptoms include significant facial swelling, bruising around the eyes, facial flattening, and the entire face can be shifted.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      20
      Seconds
  • Question 18 - A 57 year old male presents to the emergency department with a 24...

    Incorrect

    • A 57 year old male presents to the emergency department with a 24 hour history of worsening pain on the left side of the mouth and jaw. Upon examination, there is noticeable swelling of the gum around the 1st and 2nd upper left molar teeth, indicative of a dental abscess. Which of the following signs would warrant hospitalization?

      Your Answer: Fever of 38.1 ºC

      Correct Answer: Swelling of sublingual space

      Explanation:

      Patients with dental abscess should be evaluated for signs of spread into deep fascial planes. Infection of the sublingual space can lead to serious complications that can be life-threatening. Swelling in this area can cause the tongue to elevate, potentially obstructing the airway. Other complications include infections such as mediastinitis, necrotizing fasciitis, cavernous sinus thrombosis, sepsis, thoracic empyema, Lemierre’s syndrome, cerebral abscess, orbital abscess, and osteomyelitis.

      There are certain indications that may require admission to the hospital for dental abscess. These include evidence of significant systemic disturbance, inability to control the infection with antibiotics, rapid spread of infection, stridor or compromised airway, swelling of the sublingual space or pharynx, difficulty swallowing or speaking, immunocompromised patients, abscess requiring drainage under general anesthesia.

      Fever and pain are common symptoms of dental abscess but by themselves are not enough to warrant admission. Ideally, dental abscess should be managed through urgent dental review. However, if immediate dental review is not available, the patient may be treated with antibiotics as long as there are no signs of more severe infection.

      Further Reading:

      Dental abscess is a condition that usually occurs as a result of dental caries or following a dental procedure or trauma. Dental caries refers to the loss of enamel caused by acids produced by bacteria in the mouth. This allows bacteria to enter the pulp, root, and local tissues, leading to infection. The infection can then spread to surrounding tissues, causing conditions such as gingivitis or dental abscess. In severe cases, the infection can spread to deep fascial planes, resulting in conditions like retropharyngeal abscess or Ludwig’s angina.

      A dental abscess is typically caused by a combination of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, such as Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, and Prevotella. When assessing a patient with a suspected dental abscess, a thorough history and inspection of the mouth, face, and neck are necessary. This helps confirm the diagnosis and assess the risk of serious complications, such as airway compromise or deep/spreading infection.

      Some concerning features on history or examination include systemic upset (e.g., fever, vomiting), sublingual or pharyngeal swelling, stridor, dysphagia, dysphonia, dyspnea, and progression of illness despite current antibiotic treatment. It’s important to consider non-dental causes of mouth and jaw pain, such as trauma, referred sinus pain, cardiac pain radiating to the jaw, trigeminal neuralgia, otalgia radiating to the jaw, and parotid gland swelling.

      Management of a dental abscess typically involves providing analgesia (NSAIDs and paracetamol) and facilitating early dental review. Antibiotics may be prescribed in certain cases, such as when the patient does not have immediate access to a dentist and is systemically unwell, shows signs of severe infection, or is a high-risk individual (e.g., immunocompromised or diabetic). The choice of antibiotics includes amoxicillin, phenoxymethylpenicillin, or clarithromycin (if penicillin allergic). In severe or spreading infections, metronidazole may be added. The typical course of antibiotics is 5 days.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      76.3
      Seconds
  • Question 19 - A 45-year-old patient arrives at the Emergency Department after having a wisdom tooth...

    Correct

    • A 45-year-old patient arrives at the Emergency Department after having a wisdom tooth extraction performed by her dentist yesterday. She continues to experience a lack of feeling over the front two-thirds of her tongue on the left side.
      Which nerve is MOST likely to have been damaged during this procedure?

      Your Answer: Lingual nerve

      Explanation:

      The lingual nerve, a branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve, provides sensory innervation to the front two-thirds of the tongue and the floor of the mouth. It also carries fibers of the chorda tympani, a branch of the facial nerve, which returns taste information from the front two-thirds of the tongue. The diagram below illustrates the relationships of the lingual nerve in the oral cavity.

      The most common cause of lingual nerve injuries is wisdom tooth surgery. Approximately 2% of wisdom tooth extractions result in temporary injury, while permanent damage occurs in 0.2% of cases. Additionally, the nerve can be harmed during dental injections for local anesthesia.

      The anterior superior alveolar nerve, a branch of the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve, provides sensation to the incisor and canine teeth.

      The inferior alveolar nerve, another branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve, supplies sensation to the lower teeth.

      The zygomatic nerve, a branch of the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve, offers sensation to the skin over the zygomatic and temporal bones.

      Lastly, the mylohyoid nerve is a motor nerve that supplies the mylohyoid and the anterior belly of the digastric.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      36.6
      Seconds
  • Question 20 - You are requested to standby in the resuscitation bay for a 28-year-old patient...

    Correct

    • You are requested to standby in the resuscitation bay for a 28-year-old patient who is being transported to the emergency department after being hit in the face by the side mirror of a passing truck. The paramedics inform you that the patient is suspected to have a Le Fort III fracture. What characteristic differentiates a Le Fort III fracture from a Le Fort II fracture?

      Your Answer: Involvement of the zygomatic arch

      Explanation:

      Le Fort III fractures can be distinguished from Le Fort II fractures by the presence of damage to the zygomatic arch.

      Further Reading:

      The Le Fort fracture classification describes three fracture patterns seen in midface fractures, all involving the maxilla and pterygoid plate disruption. As the classification grading increases, the anatomic level of the maxillary fracture ascends from inferior to superior.

      Le Fort I fractures, also known as floating palate fractures, typically result from a downward blow struck above the upper dental row. Signs include swelling of the upper lip, bruising to the upper buccal sulcus, malocclusion, and mobile upper teeth.

      Le Fort II fractures, also known as floating maxilla fractures, are typically the result of a forceful blow to the midaxillary area. Signs include a step deformity at the infraorbital margin, oedema over the middle third of the face, sensory disturbance of the cheek, and bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis.

      Le Fort III fractures, also known as craniofacial dislocation or floating face fractures, are typically the result of high force blows to the nasal bridge or upper maxilla. These fractures involve the zygomatic arch and extend through various structures in the face. Signs include tenderness at the frontozygomatic suture, lengthening of the face, enophthalmos, and bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis.

      Management of Le Fort fractures involves securing the airway as a priority, following the ABCDE approach, and identifying and managing other injuries, especially cervical spine injuries. Severe bleeding may occur and should be addressed appropriately. Surgery is almost always required, and patients should be referred to maxillofacial surgeons. Other specialties, such as neurosurgery and ophthalmology, may need to be involved depending on the specific case.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      65.4
      Seconds
  • Question 21 - A 30-year-old woman arrives at the Emergency Department after being hit in the...

    Incorrect

    • A 30-year-old woman arrives at the Emergency Department after being hit in the jaw during a soccer game. She is experiencing pain and swelling in her jaw.
      Where is the mandible most frequently fractured in terms of anatomical locations?

      Your Answer: Body of the mandible

      Correct Answer: Angle of the mandible

      Explanation:

      Mandibular fractures are quite common, especially among young men. The most common cause of these fractures is assault, but they can also occur due to sporting injuries, motor vehicle accidents, and falls. The mandible and skull together form a complete bony ring, with the only interruption being the temporomandibular joints (TMJs). While it is expected that mandibular fractures would occur in two places, sometimes they only occur in one location. The most frequently affected areas are the angle of the mandible (27%), mandibular symphysis (21%), mandibular condylar and subcondylar (18%), body of the mandible (15%), ramus of the mandible (5%), coronoid process (1-3%), and alveolar ridge (2%).

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      43.8
      Seconds
  • Question 22 - A 27 year old male presents to the emergency department with noticeable swelling...

    Incorrect

    • A 27 year old male presents to the emergency department with noticeable swelling and bruising on his face. He reports being attacked and punched in the face repeatedly. A zygomatic fracture is suspected, prompting you to request facial X-rays. What are the two standard X-ray views included in the facial X-ray series?

      Your Answer: Occipitomental 30º and lateral

      Correct Answer: Occipitomental and occipitomental 30º

      Explanation:

      The standard facial X-ray series consists of two occipitomental x-rays: the Occipitomental (or Occipitomental 15º) and the Occipitomental 30º. The Occipitomental view captures the upper and middle thirds of the face, showing important structures such as the orbital margins, frontal sinuses, zygomatic arches, and maxillary antra. On the other hand, the Occipitomental 30º view uses a 30º caudal angulation, resulting in a less clear visualization of the orbits but a clearer view of the zygomatic arches and the walls of the maxillary antra.

      Further Reading:

      Zygomatic injuries, also known as zygomatic complex fractures, involve fractures of the zygoma bone and often affect surrounding bones such as the maxilla and temporal bones. These fractures can be classified into four positions: the lateral and inferior orbital rim, the zygomaticomaxillary buttress, and the zygomatic arch. The full extent of these injuries may not be visible on plain X-rays and may require a CT scan for accurate diagnosis.

      Zygomatic fractures can pose risks to various structures in the face. The temporalis muscle and coronoid process of the mandible may become trapped in depressed fractures of the zygomatic arch. The infraorbital nerve, which passes through the infraorbital foramen, can be injured in zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. In orbital floor fractures, the inferior rectus muscle may herniate into the maxillary sinus.

      Clinical assessment of zygomatic injuries involves observing facial asymmetry, depressed facial bones, contusion, and signs of eye injury. Visual acuity must be assessed, and any persistent bleeding from the nose or mouth should be noted. Nasal injuries, including septal hematoma, and intra-oral abnormalities should also be evaluated. Tenderness of facial bones and the temporomandibular joint should be assessed, along with any step deformities or crepitus. Eye and jaw movements must also be evaluated.

      Imaging for zygomatic injuries typically includes facial X-rays, such as occipitomental views, and CT scans for a more detailed assessment. It is important to consider the possibility of intracranial hemorrhage and cervical spine injury in patients with facial fractures.

      Management of most zygomatic fractures can be done on an outpatient basis with maxillofacial follow-up, assuming the patient is stable and there is no evidence of eye injury. However, orbital floor fractures should be referred immediately to ophthalmologists or maxillofacial surgeons. Zygomatic arch injuries that restrict mouth opening or closing due to entrapment of the temporalis muscle or mandibular condyle also require urgent referral. Nasal fractures, often seen in conjunction with other facial fractures, can be managed by outpatient ENT follow-up but should be referred urgently if there is uncontrolled epistaxis, CSF rhinorrhea, or septal hematoma.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      106.1
      Seconds
  • Question 23 - A 35-year-old woman is involved in a car crash and sustains severe facial...

    Incorrect

    • A 35-year-old woman is involved in a car crash and sustains severe facial injuries. Facial X-rays and CT scans show the presence of a Le Fort I fracture.
      What is the most probable cause of this injury?

      Your Answer: A force through the lower maxilla

      Correct Answer: A force directed in a downward direction against the upper teeth

      Explanation:

      Le Fort fractures are intricate fractures of the midface, which involve the maxillary bone and the surrounding structures. These fractures can occur in a horizontal, pyramidal, or transverse direction. The distinguishing feature of Le Fort fractures is the separation of the pterygomaxillary due to trauma. They make up approximately 10% to 20% of all facial fractures and can have severe consequences, both in terms of potential life-threatening situations and disfigurement.

      The causes of Le Fort fractures vary depending on the type of fracture. Common mechanisms include motor vehicle accidents, sports injuries, assaults, and falls from significant heights. Patients with Le Fort fractures often have concurrent head and cervical spine injuries. Additionally, they frequently experience other facial fractures, as well as neuromuscular injuries and dental avulsions.

      The specific type of fracture sustained is determined by the direction of the force applied to the face. Le Fort type I fractures typically occur when a force is directed downward against the upper teeth. Le Fort type II fractures are usually the result of a force applied to the lower or mid maxilla. Lastly, Le Fort type III fractures are typically caused by a force applied to the nasal bridge and upper part of the maxilla.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      37.8
      Seconds
  • Question 24 - A 42-year-old man comes in with bleeding from a tooth socket that began...

    Incorrect

    • A 42-year-old man comes in with bleeding from a tooth socket that began 2 hours after a dental extraction. His vital signs are as follows: heart rate of 88 bpm, blood pressure of 128/82, oxygen saturation of 99% on room air, and a temperature of 36.4°C.
      What kind of dental bleeding has occurred in this case?

      Your Answer: Immediate haemorrhage

      Correct Answer: Reactionary haemorrhage

      Explanation:

      This patient is experiencing a reactionary haemorrhage following their recent dental extraction.

      There are three types of haemorrhage that can occur after a dental extraction. The first is immediate haemorrhage, which happens at the time of extraction. The second is reactionary haemorrhage, which occurs 2-3 hours after the extraction when the vasoconstrictor effects of the local anaesthetic wear off. The third is secondary haemorrhage, which typically happens at 48-72 hours and occurs if the clot becomes infected.

      To manage this situation, the first step is to clean and rinse the mouth, removing any excessive clot. Then, a square of gauze should be rolled up into a pledgelet that is approximately twice the size of the bleeding socket and inserted. The patient should be instructed to bite down on it to apply pressure for about 10-20 minutes.

      If the bleeding continues after this initial management, the area should be anaesthetised using lidocaine with adrenaline. Following the anaesthesia, a horizontal mattress suture should be inserted, pulling the gum over the bone edges tightly enough to blanch them. It is important to refer the patient to the on-call dental surgeon at this point.

      There are several risk factors for dental haemorrhage, including hypertension, the use of anticoagulants such as warfarin, and hereditary bleeding disorders like von Willebrand disease or haemophilia.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      49.6
      Seconds
  • Question 25 - A 35-year-old man comes in with intense tooth pain that has developed 3...

    Correct

    • A 35-year-old man comes in with intense tooth pain that has developed 3 days after having a tooth pulled.
      What is the MOST LIKELY diagnosis?

      Your Answer: Acute alveolar osteitis

      Explanation:

      This patient is experiencing a condition called acute alveolar osteitis, commonly known as ‘dry socket’. It occurs when the blood clot covering the socket gets dislodged, leaving the bone and nerve exposed. This can result in infection and intense pain.

      There are several risk factors associated with the development of a dry socket. These include smoking, inadequate dental hygiene, extraction of wisdom teeth, use of oral contraceptive pills, and a previous history of dry socket.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      29.7
      Seconds
  • Question 26 - A 35-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial...

    Correct

    • A 35-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial trauma. Imaging tests show that she has a Le Fort II fracture.
      What is the most accurate description of the injury pattern seen in a Le Fort II fracture?

      Your Answer: Pyramidal-shaped fracture, with the teeth at the base of the pyramid and the nasofrontal suture at the apex

      Explanation:

      Le Fort fractures are complex fractures of the midface that involve the maxillary bone and surrounding structures. These fractures can occur in a horizontal, pyramidal, or transverse direction. The distinguishing feature of Le Fort fractures is the traumatic separation of the pterygomaxillary region. They make up approximately 10% to 20% of all facial fractures and can have severe consequences, both in terms of potential life-threatening injuries and disfigurement.

      The Le Fort classification system categorizes midface fractures into three groups based on the plane of injury. As the classification level increases, the location of the maxillary fracture moves from inferior to superior within the maxilla.

      Le Fort I fractures are horizontal fractures that occur across the lower aspect of the maxilla. These fractures cause the teeth to separate from the upper face and extend through the lower nasal septum, the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, and into the palatine bones and pterygoid plates. They are sometimes referred to as a floating palate because they often result in the mobility of the hard palate from the midface. Common accompanying symptoms include facial swelling, loose teeth, dental fractures, and misalignment of the teeth.

      Le Fort II fractures are pyramidal-shaped fractures, with the base of the pyramid located at the level of the teeth and the apex at the nasofrontal suture. The fracture line extends from the nasal bridge and passes through the superior wall of the maxilla, the lacrimal bones, the inferior orbital floor and rim, and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. These fractures are sometimes called a floating maxilla because they typically result in the mobility of the maxilla from the midface. Common symptoms include facial swelling, nosebleeds, subconjunctival hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid leakage from the nose, and widening and flattening of the nasal bridge.

      Le Fort III fractures are transverse fractures of the midface. The fracture line passes through the nasofrontal suture, the maxillo frontal suture, the orbital wall, and the zygomatic arch and zygomaticofrontal suture. These fractures cause separation of all facial bones from the cranial base, earning them the nickname craniofacial disjunction or floating face fractures. They are the rarest and most severe type of Le Fort fracture. Common symptoms include significant facial swelling, bruising around the eyes, facial flattening, and the entire face can be shifted.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      42.7
      Seconds
  • Question 27 - A 30-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial...

    Correct

    • A 30-year-old woman is injured in a car crash and sustains severe facial injuries. X-rays and CT scans of her face show that she has a Le Fort III fracture.

      Which of the following options most accurately describes a Le Fort III fracture?

      Your Answer: Craniofacial disjunction

      Explanation:

      Le Fort fractures are complex fractures of the midface that involve the maxillary bone and surrounding structures. These fractures can occur in a horizontal, pyramidal, or transverse direction. The distinguishing feature of Le Fort fractures is the traumatic separation of the pterygomaxillary region. They make up approximately 10% to 20% of all facial fractures and can have severe consequences, both in terms of potential life-threatening injuries and disfigurement.

      The Le Fort classification system categorizes midface fractures into three groups based on the plane of injury. As the classification level increases, the location of the maxillary fracture moves from inferior to superior within the maxilla.

      Le Fort I fractures are horizontal fractures that occur across the lower aspect of the maxilla. These fractures cause the teeth to separate from the upper face and extend through the lower nasal septum, the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, and into the palatine bones and pterygoid plates. They are sometimes referred to as a floating palate because they often result in the mobility of the hard palate from the midface. Common accompanying symptoms include facial swelling, loose teeth, dental fractures, and misalignment of the teeth.

      Le Fort II fractures are pyramidal-shaped fractures, with the base of the pyramid located at the level of the teeth and the apex at the nasofrontal suture. The fracture line extends from the nasal bridge and passes through the superior wall of the maxilla, the lacrimal bones, the inferior orbital floor and rim, and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. These fractures are sometimes called a floating maxilla because they typically result in the mobility of the maxilla from the midface. Common symptoms include facial swelling, nosebleeds, subconjunctival hemorrhage, cerebrospinal fluid leakage from the nose, and widening and flattening of the nasal bridge.

      Le Fort III fractures are transverse fractures of the midface. The fracture line passes through the nasofrontal suture, the maxillo frontal suture, the orbital wall, and the zygomatic arch and zygomaticofrontal suture. These fractures cause separation of all facial bones from the cranial base, earning them the nickname craniofacial disjunction or floating face fractures. They are the rarest and most severe type of Le Fort fracture. Common symptoms include significant facial swelling, bruising around the eyes, facial flattening, and the entire face can be shifted.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      32.9
      Seconds
  • Question 28 - The Emergency Medicine consultant in charge of the department today asks for your...

    Correct

    • The Emergency Medicine consultant in charge of the department today asks for your attention to present a case of superior orbital fissure syndrome (SOFS) in a 32-year-old woman with a Le Fort II fracture of the midface resulting from a car accident.
      Which cranial nerve is MOST likely to be impacted?

      Your Answer: Cranial nerve VI

      Explanation:

      The superior orbital fissure is a gap in the back wall of the orbit, created by the space between the greater and lesser wings of the sphenoid bone. Several structures pass through it to enter the orbit, starting from the top and going downwards. These include the lacrimal nerve (a branch of CN V1), the frontal nerve (another branch of CN V1), the superior ophthalmic vein, the trochlear nerve (CN IV), the superior division of the oculomotor nerve (CN III), the nasociliary nerve (a branch of CN V1), the inferior division of the oculomotor nerve (CN III), the abducens nerve (CN VI), and the inferior ophthalmic vein.

      Adjacent to the superior orbital fissure, on the back wall of the orbit and towards the middle, is the optic canal. The optic nerve (CN II) exits the orbit through this canal, along with the ophthalmic artery.

      Superior orbital fissure syndrome (SOFS) is a condition characterized by a combination of symptoms and signs that occur when cranial nerves III, IV, V1, and VI are compressed or injured as they pass through the superior orbital fissure. This condition also leads to swelling and protrusion of the eye due to impaired drainage and congestion. The main causes of SOFS are trauma, tumors, and inflammation. It is important to note that CN II is not affected by this syndrome, as it follows a separate path through the optic canal.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      58.7
      Seconds
  • Question 29 - A 30-year-old patient presents to the emergency department with an inability to close...

    Correct

    • A 30-year-old patient presents to the emergency department with an inability to close their mouth following an accidental elbow to the jaw. The suspicion is a dislocated temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Typically, in which direction does TMJ dislocation occur?

      Your Answer: Anterior

      Explanation:

      In most cases, TMJ dislocation occurs in an anterior and bilateral manner.

      TMJ dislocation occurs when the mandibular condyle is displaced from its normal position in the mandibular fossa of the temporal bone. The most common type of dislocation is bilateral anterior dislocation. This occurs when the mandible is dislocated forward and the masseter and pterygoid muscles spasm, locking the condyle in place.

      The temporomandibular joint is unique because it has an articular disc that separates the joint into upper and lower compartments. Dislocation can be caused by trauma, such as a direct blow to the open mouth, or by traumatic events like excessive mouth opening during yawning, laughing, shouting, or eating. It can also occur during dental work.

      Signs and symptoms of TMJ dislocation include difficulty fully opening or closing the mouth, pain or tenderness in the TMJ region, jaw pain, ear pain, difficulty chewing, and facial pain. Connective tissue disorders like Marfan’s and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome can increase the likelihood of dislocation.

      If TMJ dislocation is suspected, X-rays may be done to confirm the diagnosis. The best initial imaging technique is an orthopantomogram (OPG) or a standard mandibular series.

      Management of anterior dislocations involves reducing the dislocated mandible, which is usually done in the emergency department. Dislocations to the posterior, medial, or lateral side are usually associated with a mandibular fracture and should be referred to a maxillofacial surgeon.

      Reduction of an anterior dislocation involves applying distraction forces to the mandible. This can be done by gripping the mandible externally or intra-orally. In some cases, procedural sedation or local anesthesia may be used, and in rare cases, reduction may be done under general anesthesia.

      After reduction, a post-reduction X-ray is done to confirm adequate reduction and rule out any fractures caused by the procedure. Discharge advice includes following a soft diet for at least 48 hours, avoiding wide mouth opening for at least 2 weeks, and supporting the mouth with the hand during yawning or laughing. A Barton bandage may be used to support the mandible if the patient is unable to comply with the discharge advice. Referral to a maxillofacial surgeon as an outpatient is also recommended.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      32.9
      Seconds
  • Question 30 - A 28 year old female presents to the emergency department after being struck...

    Incorrect

    • A 28 year old female presents to the emergency department after being struck in the face during a night out. The patient reports a possible jaw fracture. You assess the patient for signs of mandibular fracture using the Manchester Mandibular Fracture Decision Rule.

      Which of the following signs is NOT included in the Manchester Mandibular Fracture Decision Rule?

      Your Answer: Broken teeth

      Correct Answer: Lacerations to the gum mucosa

      Explanation:

      The Manchester Mandibular Fracture Decision Rule consists of five signs that indicate a possible mandibular fracture: malocclusion, trismus, pain with mouth closed, broken teeth, and step deformity. If none of these signs are present, it is unlikely that a mandibular fracture has occurred. However, if one or more of these signs are present, it is recommended to obtain an X-ray for further evaluation. It is important to note that gum lacerations, although commonly seen in mandibular fractures, are not included in the Manchester Mandibular Fracture Decision Rule.

      Further Reading:

      Mandibular fractures are a common type of facial fracture that often present to the emergency department. The mandible, or lower jaw, is formed by the fusion of two hemimandibles and articulates with the temporomandibular joints. Fractures of the mandible are typically caused by direct lateral force and often involve multiple fracture sites, including the body, condylar head and neck, and ramus.

      When assessing for mandibular fractures, clinicians should use a look, feel, move method similar to musculoskeletal examination. However, it is important to note that TMJ effusion, muscle spasm, and pain can make moving the mandible difficult. Key signs of mandibular fracture include malocclusion, trismus (limited mouth opening), pain with the mouth closed, broken teeth, step deformity, hematoma in the sublingual space, lacerations to the gum mucosa, and bleeding from the ear.

      The Manchester Mandibular Fracture Decision Rule uses the absence of five exam findings (malocclusion, trismus, broken teeth, pain with closed mouth, and step deformity) to exclude mandibular fracture. This rule has been found to be 100% sensitive and 39% specific in detecting mandibular fractures. Imaging is an important tool in diagnosing mandibular fractures, with an OPG X-ray considered the best initial imaging for TMJ dislocation and mandibular fracture. CT may be used if the OPG is technically difficult or if a CT is being performed for other reasons, such as a head injury.

      It is important to note that head injury often accompanies mandibular fractures, so a thorough head injury assessment should be performed. Additionally, about a quarter of patients with mandibular fractures will also have a fracture of at least one other facial bone.

    • This question is part of the following fields:

      • Maxillofacial & Dental
      43.9
      Seconds

SESSION STATS - PERFORMANCE PER SPECIALTY

Maxillofacial & Dental (20/30) 67%
Passmed